Differences between revisions 1 and 2

Discussions during Sage Days 7

Acceptance Criteria for standard packages

This criteria is for acceptance of standard packages, not the criteria for consideration of packages.

GPL version 3 compatible license
The package must build on our supported architectures and pass the worry test (e.g., what is the possibility of eventually using the package on Windows?)
Quality: It should be "better" than anything else (that passes criteria 1 and 2) and the argument should be made for this. The comparison should be made to both python and other software. Criteria in passing the quality test include:
1. Speed
2. Documentation
3. Usability
4. Memory leaks
5. Maintainable
Interest and Demand:
1. JSAGE vote
2. sage-devel +1 votes (and sage-support votes)
3. How many downloads of the optional package

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2008-02-07 01:15:43 → 
  Size: 846
  Editor: jason
  Comment: acceptance criteria for standard packages
+   ← Revision 2 as of 2008-02-07 01:16:23 → ⇥
  Size: 862
  Editor: jason
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 3:
-This criteria is for''acceptance''of packages, not the criteria for consideration of packages. 1. GPL version 3 compatible license
+This criteria is for ''acceptance'' of standard packages, not the criteria for consideration of packages. 

 1. GPL version 3 compatible license