1240
Comment:
|
3955
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
== Introduction to git == * by Volker Braun * interested * Samuel * Eric * Thierry * Sébastien * Jean-Philippe * Nicolas == Import the old Sage-Combinat patches as git branch == * Nicolas == Review all tickets waiting on trac :-) == There are around [[http://trac.sagemath.org/report/75|250 tickets waiting on trac for a reviewer]] ... solution: a ticket a day! (18 dev, 5 days we should get 90 tickets) == Documentation == * Brainstorm about the refactoring of the index of the combinatorics section of the reference manual [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13605|#13605]] * Finish migrating the collection of Sage-Combinat thematic tutorials as git branches * Proofread and merge more thematic tutorials |
|
Line 15: | Line 40: |
By language we simply mean a set of finite words (rational language, D0L-system, ...). The scope ranges from combinatorics and algebra to discrete dynamical systems. Sage capabilities is currently restricted to combinatorics on single word and do not focus on structure of certain subset. We aim to implement an abstract and easy to reuse infrastructure for languages. |
|
Line 17: | Line 44: |
* Thierry * Sébastien |
|
Line 19: | Line 48: |
* implement the category of languages (from previous work of me and Stepan, [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12224|#12224]], [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12225|#12225]], [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12227|#12227]]) | * implement the category of languages (from previous work of Vincent and Stepan, [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12224|#12224]], [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12225|#12225]], [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12227|#12227]]) |
Line 23: | Line 52: |
A translation surface is a geometric and dynamical objects that can be defined from gluing polygons by translation. It is interesting from geometric and dynamical point of vue. Many computations are possible ! |
|
Line 31: | Line 62: |
* include Charles's code into Sage | * include Charles Fougeron's code into Sage (computation of Lyapunov exponents, decomposition of the Hodge bundle) |
Line 35: | Line 66: |
Finish #10963, brainstorm the follow ups. |
|
Line 40: | Line 73: |
Line 45: | Line 77: |
* Vincent * Jean-Philippe |
|
Line 53: | Line 87: |
== Refactor continued fractions == * interested * Thierry * Vincent * Luca * todo: see [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14567|#14567]] == Dynamical systems simulation (statistics of orbits) == * interested * Thierry * Sébastien * Vincent * Jean-Philippe == on-line db for Sage worksheets and other ressources == * Thierry * Vincent * Luca == Lazy Multivariate Power Series == * Matthieu Dien * Vincent == Real numbers == There are many ways to represent real numbers: * rational numbers * algebraic numbers * expansions in a given basis * continued fractions (and generalizations) * symbolic expressions (involving transcendental functions like cos, exp, pi, ...) * ... But Sage currently has no bridge between them... == Refactor Elliptic curves and morphisms == See [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12880|#12880|]] (and also problem with scheme morphisms [[http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15378|#15378]], maybe also that !SchemeMorphism currently does not inherit from !Morphisn, see the description of #14711) * Interested: * Luca * Vincent |
Tentative list of themes
A list of topics for Sage days 57. Participants, please edit!
Introduction to git
- by Volker Braun
- interested
- Samuel
- Eric
- Thierry
- Sébastien
- Jean-Philippe
- Nicolas
Import the old Sage-Combinat patches as git branch
- Nicolas
Review all tickets waiting on trac :-)
There are around 250 tickets waiting on trac for a reviewer ... solution: a ticket a day! (18 dev, 5 days we should get 90 tickets)
Documentation
Brainstorm about the refactoring of the index of the combinatorics section of the reference manual #13605
- Finish migrating the collection of Sage-Combinat thematic tutorials as git branches
- Proofread and merge more thematic tutorials
Coxeter groups
- interested
- Jean-Philippe Labbé
- Nicolas M. Thiéry
- Vivien Ripoll
- ...
Languages
By language we simply mean a set of finite words (rational language, D0L-system, ...). The scope ranges from combinatorics and algebra to discrete dynamical systems. Sage capabilities is currently restricted to combinatorics on single word and do not focus on structure of certain subset. We aim to implement an abstract and easy to reuse infrastructure for languages.
- interested
- Vincent
- Thierry
- Sébastien
- todo
Translation surfaces
A translation surface is a geometric and dynamical objects that can be defined from gluing polygons by translation. It is interesting from geometric and dynamical point of vue. Many computations are possible !
- interested
- Vincent
- Samuel
- Thierry
- todo
- better datastructure for permutations
- include Charles Fougeron's code into Sage (computation of Lyapunov exponents, decomposition of the Hodge bundle)
- datastructure for translation surfaces
Categories
Finish #10963, brainstorm the follow ups.
- interested
- Nicolas
- Eric
Polyhedra over number fields
- interested
- Volker
- Vincent
- Jean-Philippe
Tensors on free modules
- interested
- Eric
- todo
implement tensor products of generic free modules and the associated tensor algebra (by generic it is meant without any privileged basis)
Refactor continued fractions
- interested
- Thierry
- Vincent
- Luca
todo: see #14567
Dynamical systems simulation (statistics of orbits)
- interested
- Thierry
- Sébastien
- Vincent
- Jean-Philippe
on-line db for Sage worksheets and other ressources
- Thierry
- Vincent
- Luca
Lazy Multivariate Power Series
- Matthieu Dien
- Vincent
Real numbers
There are many ways to represent real numbers:
- rational numbers
- algebraic numbers
- expansions in a given basis
- continued fractions (and generalizations)
- symbolic expressions (involving transcendental functions like cos, exp, pi, ...)
- ...
But Sage currently has no bridge between them...
Refactor Elliptic curves and morphisms
See #12880 (and also problem with scheme morphisms #15378, maybe also that SchemeMorphism currently does not inherit from !Morphisn, see the description of #14711)
- Interested:
- Luca
- Vincent