Differences between revisions 31 and 32
Revision 31 as of 2011-09-26 22:13:17
Size: 1807
Editor: katestange
Comment:
Revision 32 as of 2011-09-26 23:46:12
Size: 1827
Editor: aly.deines
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 20: Line 20:
* Ticket needs review! [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11827|#11827]] * Ticket needs review! [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11827|#11827]] -- Positive review!!

Project Leader

Kate

Group Members

Aly, Jenn, Diane, Ekin

Project Description

Associated notebook file KateWishList.sws

Projects are listed by section below. No one is currently working on these ones:

  • Compute lots of examples to find guesses for bounds on "C"
  • Put Kate's EDS class into sage (document properly)?

Restricted global_minimal_model()

* Ticket needs review! #11827 -- Positive review!!

Wrapping E.reduction(prime)(P)

* Our first positive review! #11822

p-adics

* Implement E.reduction(p) for E defined over a p-adic fields: reduction of elliptic curves over padics.sws

  • This found a bug/needed enhancement which is now reported: #11826

* Tate's algorithm Tate.sws

Singular Cubics

Trac ticket 11823

* Currently the patch on the trac server will allow one to define singular cubics.

sage: E = WeierstrassCubic([0,0,0,0,0])
sage: E.is_singular()
True

* Stuff to do:

  • Work through elliptic curve documentation, test functions that should work for singular curves, and update the following lists
  • Document the WeierstrassCubic and SingularWeierstrass classes we've created

  • Do the stuff on the list below
  • make E.reduction(bad_prime) able to return this singular cubic object
  • put the checks back in for EllipticCurve and SingularWeierstrass that it is actually (or is not) singular

* Functions that seem ok out of the box (so need only documentation adjustment/testing):

  • a_invariants() etc

days33/kates (last edited 2011-10-01 17:59:47 by ekin)