Differences between revisions 2 and 12 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2012-02-27 21:36:43
Size: 1203
Editor: roed
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2012-03-02 05:25:44
Size: 1462
Editor: robertwb
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
* Review some of the 275 tickets currently needing review.
* Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure. This may include setting up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Perforce system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board), requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer and setting up systems to provide defaults, fixing patchbot and finishing the new doctesting code (#12415)
 * Review some of the 278 tickets currently needing review.
 * Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure.
   * Set
up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Mondrian system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board)
   * Implement a system
requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer (while providing defaults)
   *
fixing patchbot
   * finishing the new doctesting code: [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415|
#12415]]
Line 22: Line 26:
 * Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
 * Rob Beezer (University of Puget Sound)
Line 23: Line 29:
 * Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
 * Karl-Dieter Crisman (Gordon College)
 * Tom Boothby (Simon Fraser University)
 * Robert Bradshaw (Google)
Line 26: Line 32:
 * R. Andrew Ohana (University of Washington)
 * John Palmieri (University of Washington)
Line 27: Line 35:
 * William Stein (University of Washington)  * William Stein (University of Washington) -- but will be gone March 20 to ICERM.

Sage Review Days 2: Seattle, WA

March 17-22, University of Washington

The purpose of this workshop will be twofold.

  • Review some of the 278 tickets currently needing review.
  • Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure.
    • Set up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Mondrian system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board)
    • Implement a system requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer (while providing defaults)
    • fixing patchbot
    • finishing the new doctesting code: #12415

Funding

Funding is still available: e-mail David Roe for more details.

Participants

The conference is organized by

The following people are likely to participate

  • Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
  • Rob Beezer (University of Puget Sound)
  • Jon Bober (University of Washington)
  • Tom Boothby (Simon Fraser University)
  • Robert Bradshaw (Google)
  • Keshav Kini (Nanyang Technological University)
  • R. Andrew Ohana (University of Washington)
  • John Palmieri (University of Washington)
  • David Roe (University of Calgary)
  • William Stein (University of Washington) -- but will be gone March 20 to ICERM.

Lodging

Participants will stay at the Collegiana Inn -- 4311 - 12th Ave. NE Seattle, WA.

review2 (last edited 2012-03-23 23:17:31 by roed)