Differences between revisions 6 and 14 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 6 as of 2006-10-14 17:01:48
Size: 1178
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2006-10-17 21:58:26
Size: 997
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
Our initial tests are designed to compare the constructions and very basic functionality found in our [http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/graph_survey survey of existing software]. At this stage in the game, we are testing to find the best way to construct graph objects in ["SAGE"].
Line 14: Line 12:
 . For the first round of benchmarking, we will be comparing MAGMA, Mathematica (with Combinatorica), Maple, NetworkX, GRAPE, and nauty.  . Our initial tests are designed to compare the constructions and very basic functionality found in our [http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/graph_survey survey of existing software]. At this stage in the game, we are testing to find the best way to construct graph objects in ["SAGE"]. For the first round of benchmarking we will only consider simple undirected graphs, and we will be comparing MAGMA, Mathematica (with Combinatorica), Maple, NetworkX, GRAPE, and nauty.
Line 16: Line 14:
=== Generic Constructor ===
 * Create a graph with n nodes and no edges

=== Edge Storage ===
 * Fill in and then delete all edges one by one

=== Specific Constructors ===
==== Complete ====
==== Complete bipartite ====
==== Cycle ====

=== Basic Algorithms ===
==== Connectivity ====
==== Diameter ====
==== Girth ====
==== Chromatic number ====
=== Algorithms ===
 . From a given database of graphs, we will compute
 * Connectivity
 * Diameter
 * Girth
 * Chromatic number

TableOfContents

Introduction

The SAGE [http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/graph Graph Theory Project] aims to implement Graph objects and algorithms in ["SAGE"].

The main people working on this project are Emily Kirkman, Robert Miller and Bobby Moretti.

We will post results here as we get them. And as always, we love feedback!

Initial Benchmarks

  • Our initial tests are designed to compare the constructions and very basic functionality found in our [http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/graph_survey survey of existing software]. At this stage in the game, we are testing to find the best way to construct graph objects in ["SAGE"]. For the first round of benchmarking we will only consider simple undirected graphs, and we will be comparing MAGMA, Mathematica (with Combinatorica), Maple, NetworkX, GRAPE, and nauty.

Algorithms

  • From a given database of graphs, we will compute
  • Connectivity
  • Diameter
  • Girth
  • Chromatic number

graph_benchmark (last edited 2008-11-14 13:41:59 by anonymous)