Differences between revisions 18 and 33 (spanning 15 versions)
Revision 18 as of 2008-01-04 03:07:53
Size: 3460
Editor: TimAbbott
Comment:
Revision 33 as of 2008-01-10 02:23:31
Size: 3721
Editor: TimAbbott
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
- All new packages still need Description and Copyright information - All new packages still need Descriptions, Copyright information, and a fixed changelog
- spkg-install and sage-patches should be deleted from the debian directories.
Line 18: Line 19:
no cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should be renamed to libcdd-dev no cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should perhaps have dynamic library
Line 30: Line 31:
no flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: no progress no flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: packaged
Line 37: Line 38:
no gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged, but its automatically generated symlinks are absolute! no gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged
Line 43: Line 44:
no iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: tries to install into / no iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: packaged
Line 46: Line 47:
no java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. no java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. - Has also been been removed and replaced by jmol
Line 48: Line 49:
no lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; need .orig.tar.gz / version number. no lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; though based on SAGE upstream
Line 52: Line 53:
no linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: fails to configure. no linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: packaged but has automake issues?; based on SAGE upstream
no linbox-wrap STATUS: blocking on linbox
Line 76: Line 78:
no singular-3-0-4 STATUS: no progress no singular-3-0-4 STATUS: Fails to configure ...
Line 78: Line 80:
no symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works. Should we package symmetrica itself too? no symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works. Should package symmetrica itself and a dynamic library too?  Docs?
Line 97: Line 99:

dpkg-awk is a good tool for auto-generating such data. -- Tim

Legend:

-- .... doesn't apply

no .... the package is not in Debian

yes ... the package is in Debian, sometimes there is more information about it in brackets (i.e. older, newer)

Tags:

[OPT] ... this package is optional

Debian status for packaging of SAGE:

- All new packages still need Descriptions, Copyright information, and a fixed changelog
- spkg-install and sage-patches should be deleted from the debian directories.
- Several libdev packages should depend on the library versions.
yes blas-20070724
no  cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should perhaps have dynamic library
yes clisp-2.41.p11
no  conway_polynomials-0.2 STATUS: unpackaged.  I don't know where this should get installed.
yes cvxopt-0.8.2.p4  [0.9-3]
no  cython-0.9.6.8.b STATUS: packaged.
--  doc-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress
yes ecm-6.1.3
--  elliptic_curves-0.1 STATUS: no progress
--  examples-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress
--  extcode-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress
yes f2c-20070816
no  flint-0.2.p4 STATUS: libflint-dev has no .a file; no soname.
no  flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: packaged
yes fortran-20070912
yes freetype-2.1.10
yes gap-4.4.10 [but old version]
yes gd-2.0.33.p5
yes gdmodule-0.56.p4  [python 2.4 only]
no  genus2reduction-0.3 STATUS: packaged
no  gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged
no  givaro-3.2.6.p3 STATUS: packaged, though based on SAGE upstream.
yes gmp-4.2.1.p11
yes gnutls-1.6.3 [better version]
--  graphs-20070722 STATUS: no progress
yes gsl-1.9 [better version, GPLv3]
no  iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: packaged
yes ipython-0.8.1.p1
no  ipython1-20070130 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE.
no  java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. - Has also been been removed and replaced by jmol
yes lapack-20070723
no  lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; though based on SAGE upstream
no  libfplll-2.1-20071024 STATUS: packaged.
yes libgcrypt-1.2.4
yes libgpg_error-1.5
no  linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: packaged but has automake issues?; based on SAGE upstream
no  linbox-wrap STATUS: blocking on linbox
yes matplotlib-0.90.0.p5 [debian, better]
yes maxima-5.13.0.p1
yes mercurial-0.9.5
yes moin-1.5.7.p1
yes mpfi-1.3.4-rc3.p9 [but old buggy version]
yes mpfr-2.3.0p4 [yes]
no  mwrank-20070913 STATUS: packaged; libmwrank lacks soname
yes networkx-0.35.1  [same version]
no  ntl-5.4.1.p6 STATUS: Should have doc package?  libntl lacks soname.
yes numpy-20070816
yes opencdk-0.5.9  [debian; better version]
no  palp-1.1 STATUS: packaged
yes pari-2.3.2.p4
yes pexpect-2.0.p1 [debian; newer crap version]
yes pycrypto-2.0.1.p1 [yes]
yes python-2.5.1.p8
yes python_gnutls-1.1.1
yes quaddouble-2.2.p7 STATUS: In debian with earlier version named qd.
yes readline-5.2
no  sage-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress
no  sage_scripts-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress
yes scipy-20070817
yes scons-0.97
no  singular-3-0-4 STATUS: Fails to configure ...
yes sqlite-3.3.17.p1
no  symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works.  Should package symmetrica itself and a dynamic library too?  Docs?  
no  sympow-1.018.1.p3 STATUS: packaged.
yes sympy-0.5.6
no  tachyon-0.98beta.p3 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE
yes termcap-1.3.1
yes twisted-2.5.0.p8
yes weave-0.4.9
yes zlib-1.2.3.p2
yes zodb3-3.7.0

I'm creating a new list below here with links to the packages in Debian:

yes

[http://packages.debian.org/gimp gimp]

2.4.2-1

yes

[http://packages.debian.org/maxima maxima]

5.13.0-3

yes

[http://packages.debian.org/lie lie]

2.2.2+dfsg-1

[OPT]

Maybe the list could be automatically generated? The version info changes quite often. --Ondrej

dpkg-awk is a good tool for auto-generating such data. -- Tim

days6/sprint/debian (last edited 2008-11-14 13:42:10 by anonymous)