3432
Comment:
|
3721
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 15: | Line 15: |
- All new packages still need Description and Copyright information | - All new packages still need Descriptions, Copyright information, and a fixed changelog - spkg-install and sage-patches should be deleted from the debian directories. |
Line 18: | Line 19: |
no cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should be renamed to libcdd-dev | no cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should perhaps have dynamic library |
Line 29: | Line 30: |
no flint-0.2.p4 STATUS: no progress no flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: no progress |
no flint-0.2.p4 STATUS: libflint-dev has no .a file; no soname. no flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: packaged |
Line 37: | Line 38: |
no gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged, but its automatically generated symlinks are absolute! | no gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged |
Line 43: | Line 44: |
no iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: tries to install into / | no iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: packaged |
Line 46: | Line 47: |
no java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. | no java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. - Has also been been removed and replaced by jmol |
Line 48: | Line 49: |
no lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; need .orig.tar.gz / version number. | no lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; though based on SAGE upstream |
Line 52: | Line 53: |
no linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: fails to configure. | no linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: packaged but has automake issues?; based on SAGE upstream no linbox-wrap STATUS: blocking on linbox |
Line 76: | Line 78: |
no singular-3-0-4 STATUS: no progress | no singular-3-0-4 STATUS: Fails to configure ... |
Line 78: | Line 80: |
no symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works. Should we package symmetrica itself too? | no symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works. Should package symmetrica itself and a dynamic library too? Docs? |
Line 97: | Line 99: |
dpkg-awk is a good tool for auto-generating such data. -- Tim |
Legend:
-- .... doesn't apply
no .... the package is not in Debian
yes ... the package is in Debian, sometimes there is more information about it in brackets (i.e. older, newer)
Tags:
[OPT] ... this package is optional
Debian status for packaging of SAGE:
- All new packages still need Descriptions, Copyright information, and a fixed changelog - spkg-install and sage-patches should be deleted from the debian directories. - Several libdev packages should depend on the library versions. yes blas-20070724 no cddlib-094b STATUS: package created; should perhaps have dynamic library yes clisp-2.41.p11 no conway_polynomials-0.2 STATUS: unpackaged. I don't know where this should get installed. yes cvxopt-0.8.2.p4 [0.9-3] no cython-0.9.6.8.b STATUS: packaged. -- doc-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress yes ecm-6.1.3 -- elliptic_curves-0.1 STATUS: no progress -- examples-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress -- extcode-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress yes f2c-20070816 no flint-0.2.p4 STATUS: libflint-dev has no .a file; no soname. no flintqs-20070817.p1 STATUS: packaged yes fortran-20070912 yes freetype-2.1.10 yes gap-4.4.10 [but old version] yes gd-2.0.33.p5 yes gdmodule-0.56.p4 [python 2.4 only] no genus2reduction-0.3 STATUS: packaged no gfan-0.2.2.p1 STATUS: packaged no givaro-3.2.6.p3 STATUS: packaged, though based on SAGE upstream. yes gmp-4.2.1.p11 yes gnutls-1.6.3 [better version] -- graphs-20070722 STATUS: no progress yes gsl-1.9 [better version, GPLv3] no iml-1.0.1.p7 STATUS: packaged yes ipython-0.8.1.p1 no ipython1-20070130 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. no java3d-20070901 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE. - Has also been been removed and replaced by jmol yes lapack-20070723 no lcalc-20070107.p0 STATUS: packaged; though based on SAGE upstream no libfplll-2.1-20071024 STATUS: packaged. yes libgcrypt-1.2.4 yes libgpg_error-1.5 no linbox-20070915.p1 STATUS: packaged but has automake issues?; based on SAGE upstream no linbox-wrap STATUS: blocking on linbox yes matplotlib-0.90.0.p5 [debian, better] yes maxima-5.13.0.p1 yes mercurial-0.9.5 yes moin-1.5.7.p1 yes mpfi-1.3.4-rc3.p9 [but old buggy version] yes mpfr-2.3.0p4 [yes] no mwrank-20070913 STATUS: packaged; libmwrank lacks soname yes networkx-0.35.1 [same version] no ntl-5.4.1.p6 STATUS: Should have doc package? libntl lacks soname. yes numpy-20070816 yes opencdk-0.5.9 [debian; better version] no palp-1.1 STATUS: packaged yes pari-2.3.2.p4 yes pexpect-2.0.p1 [debian; newer crap version] yes pycrypto-2.0.1.p1 [yes] yes python-2.5.1.p8 yes python_gnutls-1.1.1 yes quaddouble-2.2.p7 STATUS: In debian with earlier version named qd. yes readline-5.2 no sage-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress no sage_scripts-2.8.12 STATUS: no progress yes scipy-20070817 yes scons-0.97 no singular-3-0-4 STATUS: Fails to configure ... yes sqlite-3.3.17.p1 no symmetrica-2.0.p0 STATUS: libsymmetrica-dev package works. Should package symmetrica itself and a dynamic library too? Docs? no sympow-1.018.1.p3 STATUS: packaged. yes sympy-0.5.6 no tachyon-0.98beta.p3 STATUS: Not essential for SAGE yes termcap-1.3.1 yes twisted-2.5.0.p8 yes weave-0.4.9 yes zlib-1.2.3.p2 yes zodb3-3.7.0
I'm creating a new list below here with links to the packages in Debian:
yes |
2.4.2-1 |
|
|
yes |
[http://packages.debian.org/maxima maxima] |
5.13.0-3 |
|
yes |
2.2.2+dfsg-1 |
[OPT] |
Maybe the list could be automatically generated? The version info changes quite often. --Ondrej
dpkg-awk is a good tool for auto-generating such data. -- Tim