Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2007-10-03 18:41:40
Size: 1574
Editor: NilsBruin
Revision 3 as of 2008-11-14 13:42:08
Size: 1574
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
No differences found!

Some ideas for implementing divisor arithmetic on curves

  • In Singular, there is an implementation of the Brill-Noether algorithm for plane curves over finite field. See the documentation for examples where singular returns invalid results
  • Brill-Noether is a well-documented algorithm. There are already master theses around on implementing it. For implementing Brill-Noether, one needs to analyze the singularities of the curve, which one can do via blow-up. This is going to be challenging if the singular locus is not split over the base field.
  • Once analyzing singular places is in place, implementing Brill-Noether might be in interesting exercise.
  • I expect that the approach of Florian Hess (view the function field of a curve as a finite extension of k(t) rather than as the field of fractions of k[x,y]/( f(x,y) ) will be more efficient in most cases. For that we need integral closure of k[x] in k(x)[y]/( f(x,y)). To deal with the places at infinity, one could either work with the integral closure of k[1/x] in k(x)[y]/ ( f(x,y)) or with a semilocal ring with only the places above (1/x). We will need ideal arithmetic in those rings (both using 2 generator representation and as finite k[t]-modules)
  • It will be interesting to have reasonable implementations of both Brill-Noether and of Hess's method for comparison. I don't think they have ever properly been pitched against each other. - Somebody would need to implement finite extensions of arbitrary fields. In particular, univariate polynomial factorization over any field.

days5/proj/divisorarith (last edited 2008-11-14 13:42:08 by localhost)