790
Comment:
|
793
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
1. What are the absolutely critical "killer" features that you *must* have in the mathematical software you use for ''your'' research. | 1. What are the absolutely critical "killer" features that you *must* have in the mathematical software you use for ''your'' research? 1. What are the "killer" features that your dream mathematical software would have? |
Line 6: | Line 8: |
1. Should Macaulay2 be made a standard component of Sage this year? Why or why not? |
|
Line 12: | Line 12: |
Discussion: Sage, Macaulay 2, and other Mathematical Software for Algebraic Geometry
What are the absolutely critical "killer" features that you *must* have in the mathematical software you use for your research?
- What are the "killer" features that your dream mathematical software would have?
- Do you use or want to use 2d and 3d graphics in your research (or papers)? If so, how? What are you missing?
- What are some things that disturb you about the direction in which Sage is going? (E.g., too big/ambitious? not open enough or too open? too many bugs? changing too quickly? referee process for code inclusion too onerous?)
- What are some things that disturb you about the direction in which Macaulay2 is going? (similar e.g. as above)