|
Size: 15
Comment:
|
Size: 878
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 2: | Line 2: |
| * sage.combinat.word is not imported by default * word.symmetric_group_action_on_values does not naturally belong in word * word.standard should be called word.standardization * word.charge returns the cocharge * CombinatorialAlgebra has no useful documentation * CombinatorialClass has no documentation * It would be nice for CombinatorialObject to have a method 'indices' which returns a list of the index of *every* occurrence of x * Compositions has no option for allowing '0' parts (which are often useful) * Composition.conjugate() is not explained * Composition.descents() is not explained * Composition.major_index() doc-string says it is the sum of the descents. This is not true for the given example. * Composition.refinement() is not explained * SignedCompositions has no corresponding class SignedComposition |
Weirdness
- sage.combinat.word is not imported by default
- word.symmetric_group_action_on_values does not naturally belong in word
- word.standard should be called word.standardization
- word.charge returns the cocharge
CombinatorialAlgebra has no useful documentation
CombinatorialClass has no documentation
It would be nice for CombinatorialObject to have a method 'indices' which returns a list of the index of *every* occurrence of x
- Compositions has no option for allowing '0' parts (which are often useful)
- Composition.conjugate() is not explained
- Composition.descents() is not explained
- Composition.major_index() doc-string says it is the sum of the descents. This is not true for the given example.
- Composition.refinement() is not explained
SignedCompositions has no corresponding class SignedComposition