|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2007-09-06 17:30:37
Size: 19712
Comment:
|
Size: 27381
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 306: | Line 306: |
| [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:41] <sage> I don't remember, to be honest. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:53] <sage> You could remove setting it and do a complete build of SAGE and see if it works. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:03] <mabshoff> I could :) [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:30] <mabshoff> Problem might be that "LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.3.rc3/local/lib/:" has the trailing ":" [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:39] <sage> ah. you could change that too [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:06] <mabshoff> If LD_WHATEVER is empty skip the $LD_WHATEVER on export : [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:08] <mabshoff> . [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:13] <mabshoff> Removing the trailing ":" makes configure work. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:42] <mabshoff> May be a bug in the configure macro, [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:23:01] <mabshoff> because "empty string" after the separator ":" is not equal to "." [10:30] --> You have joined the channel #sage-devel ([email protected]). [10:31] *** Channel modes: secret, no messages from outside [10:31] *** This channel was created on 08/17/2007 01:03:33 PM. [10:31] <malb> I see [10:31] <dmharvey> back [10:31] <sage-log> sage-log == "William's home desktop" [10:33] <burcin> #599: it's a very simple change in local/bin/sage-valgrind [10:33] <burcin> #599: one can do it by hand, but there is a patch in trac too [10:33] <wstein> good. [10:34] <burcin> is there a way of making the sage shell not print out the output, without using assignments? [10:35] <wstein> no [10:35] <wstein> ; [10:36] <wstein> put a semicolon at the end of the line? [10:37] *** syazdani is now known as syazdani|away. [10:37] <-- pdehaye has left this server. [10:39] <wstein> #599 -- why is it "sage-memcheck" instead of "sage-valgrind"? [10:40] <wstein> #599 -- also, why remove the pid from the filename? [10:40] <burcin> valgrind puts the pid itself.. [10:40] <wstein> oh, good. [10:40] <malb> there are several valgrind tools [10:40] <malb> we are using memcheck right now [10:40] <sage-log> ok, that's clear. [10:40] <malb> but there is also massif and cachegrind and so on [10:41] <malb> so its good to allow different names for different valgrind tools [10:41] <mabshoff|away> hi [10:41] *** mabshoff|away is now known as mabshoff. [10:41] <mabshoff> I have patches for the proper place of logfiles, [10:41] <mabshoff> and massif + cachegrind [10:41] <mabshoff> support. [10:41] <dmharvey> hi mabshoff, do you want to work on gcd now? [10:42] <mabshoff> Give me about half am hour for valgrind patches. [10:42] <dmharvey> ok [10:42] <mabshoff> And I have two Solaris build issues I would like to get merged ASAP. [10:42] <mabshoff> 1 is in scons: prefer g++ over SunPro for compiler, [10:42] <mabshoff> the other two are build fixes in sage_lib for Solarisl [10:42] <mabshoff> . [10:43] <mabshoff> For valgrind: -valgrind becomes an alias for -memcheck [10:43] <mabshoff> I also add -massif and -cachegrind. [10:43] <mabshoff> For now they use the "default" flags I use, but we could add env variables to overwrite. [10:44] <mabshoff> That is not implemented yet. [10:44] <mabshoff> Should I send you the patch?? [10:44] <mabshoff> Or does anybody prefer something different? [10:45] <mabshoff> re pid & valgrind: That can be changed per default. [10:45] <malb> I am all for PID [10:46] <malb> maybe printing the PID at startup when run with valgrind would be nice [10:46] <mabshoff> Of which process? [10:46] <timothyclemans> i'm working on 549 [10:46] <mabshoff> The problem is that the output from 3.3.0svn no longer put the pid *inside* the logfile. [10:46] <mabshoff> But that let's you potentially diff output from different runs much better. [10:47] --> dmharvey2 has joined this channel ([email protected]). [10:47] <malb> process: SAGE the most interesting one [10:47] <wstein> #594 -- it's closed (and in) -- this is Malb's magma ideal patch. [10:47] <malb> cool [10:47] <wstein> malb -- i added a docstring to your magma.py ideal function. hg_sage.pull() and look to make sure it is ok. [10:47] <mabshoff> Is there an obvious non-racy way to getermine the SAGE pid? [10:48] <mabshoff> Also for the patch: Where is the official sage-script hg repo in the tarball? [10:48] <wstein> #549 -- I'm trying to replicate that too. [10:49] <timothyclemans> i see it [10:49] <timothyclemans> empty lines need <br /> [10:50] <timothyclemans> maybe do a loop and if i == '\n' add '<br />' ? [10:52] <malb> wstein, magma docstring looks good [10:53] <wstein> #549 -- no. [10:53] <wstein> since it's a pre environment. [10:54] <timothyclemans> in the html code i see the line spaces but they need to be <br /> [10:54] <wstein> #549 -- maybe the css is broken. [10:54] <timothyclemans> huh to do a line space don't you do <br /> [10:55] <wstein> In a pre that isn't needed. [10:55] <wstein> Try it by itself. [10:55] <timothyclemans> i am [10:56] <timothyclemans> i see [10:57] <wstein> #549 -- look at pre.shrunk in css.py. [10:58] <wstein> it has "display:inline" [10:58] <wstein> which evidently gets rid of blank spaces. [10:58] <wstein> If you comment it out, then the blank *lines* come back. [10:58] <wstein> Unfortunately there is way too much padding around the pre then. [10:58] <timothyclemans> also tidy says that you can't have span around pre [11:01] <mabshoff> malb, burcin: Suggestion now is: log to sage-memcheck.PID, sage-massif.PID, sage-cachegrind.PID in $SAGE_ROOT [11:01] <mabshoff> depending on the tool used. [11:01] <malb> no, not in $SAGE_ROOT we might not have write access there [11:01] <dmharvey2> #424: apart from the new files and lines of code, it looks like the following files *may* need to be modified: configure, configure.in, gmp-h.in, mpn/asm-defs.m4, mpn/Makefile.am, mpn/Makefile.in. I don't totally understand the relationship between these files, I know that automake or autoconf or something generates some of these files from others. But we don't want SAGE to depend on automake/autoconf etc, correct? So does that m [11:01] <mabshoff> true. [11:01] <mabshoff> $SAGE_RC? [11:02] <burcin> mabshoff: $HOME/.sage/ was suggested.. [11:02] <mabshoff> Okay, that works. [11:02] <mabshoff> but how about sage-$TOOL.$PID? [11:02] <wstein> #549 -- thanks timothy -- good point! [11:02] <burcin> mabshoff: yes.. I think that was the spirit of malb's sage-memcheck idea [11:03] <wstein> #549 -- your hint about span and pre was enough for tom to claim to know what to do. [11:03] <wstein> I'm going to stop working on #549 and let you and he work on it. [11:03] <mabshoff> Yep, will do. [11:03] <mabshoff> And I wil add the extra -massif & -cachegrind flags. [11:03] <mabshoff> -valgrind will stay an alias for memcheck [11:04] <mabshoff> Everybody happy that way? [11:04] <wstein> #424 -- SAGE can't depend on autoconf. [11:04] <burcin> mabshoff: yep, that great [11:04] <burcin> sorry.. can't type :) [11:04] <wstein> So whatever files you get when you do autoreconf --all you have to copy out to patches, then copy in during spkg-install. [11:04] <wstein> This is for #424 [11:05] <dmharvey> #424: I remember last time I tried using autoconf for this I had problems with a version mismatch [11:05] <dmharvey> #424: so maybe I'll try doing it manually [11:05] <wstein> #549 -- boothby has actually fixed this before and it got lost, evidently... [11:05] <wstein> dmharvey -- if possible you may want to work on sage.math for this, so others can look directly at what you're doing... [11:06] <dmharvey> wstein: okay, good idea, I'll move over there. Everything will be in /home/dmharvey/424/. (in a few minutes) |
Irc log for Bug Squash Day 2
[Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:41] <sage> I don't remember, to be honest. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:53] <sage> You could remove setting it and do a complete build of SAGE and see if it works. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:03] <mabshoff> I could :) [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:30] <mabshoff> Problem might be that "LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.3.rc3/local/lib/:" has the trailing ":" [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:39] <sage> ah. you could change that too [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:06] <mabshoff> If LD_WHATEVER is empty skip the $LD_WHATEVER on export : [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:08] <mabshoff> . [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:13] <mabshoff> Removing the trailing ":" makes configure work. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:42] <mabshoff> May be a bug in the configure macro, [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:23:01] <mabshoff> because "empty string" after the separator ":" is not equal to "." [09:05] --> You have joined the channel #sage-devel ([email protected]). [09:05] [Channel] [freenode-info] if you need to send private messages, please register: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#privmsg [09:05] *** Channel modes: secret, no messages from outside [09:05] *** This channel was created on 08/17/2007 01:03:33 PM. [09:05] <mabshoff> Yep, just did my math. [09:05] <mabshoff> hi wstein. [09:05] <mabshoff> M2 r5870 now builds out of the box on Linux :) [09:05] <wstein> hi [09:05] <mabshoff> And there is a google group for M2 now, too. [09:06] <wstein> yep, i'm glad they set that up. [09:06] <mabshoff> I got an invite, so I assume you got one, too. [09:06] <wstein> mabshoff -- can i make you an admin of the sage-devel google group? [09:06] <mabshoff> And all my issues I reported in less than 6 hours each. [09:06] <wstein> the main reason is that new posters are moderated, and having more moderators make [09:06] <wstein> this easier. [09:07] <mabshoff> Sure, at your own risk, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolute. [09:07] <wstein> and sage-devel keeps groowing. [09:07] <mabshoff> Sure, go ahead, being in a different time zone kind of fills the gap. [09:07] <mabshoff> And I am online wayyy to much, but hey. [09:08] <wstein> done. [09:09] <mabshoff> Okay, looks like it works. [09:09] <mabshoff> I can see "settings" [09:09] <mabshoff> I will browse a little and ask questions as I see them down the road. [09:11] <dmharvey> okay, I'm going to start looking at the gmp gcd thing (#424). I'm going to start by making a plain text patch for the 4.2.1 tarball which at least puts all the right files in the right places, but doesn't touch the autoconf stuff yet. [09:11] <mabshoff> Shouldn't we considering rebasing against 4.2.2? [09:11] <mabshoff> It will add official support for Solaris/Opteron. [09:11] <mabshoff> And gcc 4.3 :) [09:12] <mabshoff> gmp 4.2.2rc3 is the latest, but that should become 4.2.2 today or tomorrow. [09:14] <dmharvey2> ok, well it does look imminent, so I'll try against that instead [09:15] <mabshoff> Sure, the question is how difficult it will be to rebase. [09:15] <mabshoff> The new improved gcd stuff and so on is pretty much "just" a drop new file in the right directory kind of operation. [09:15] <dmharvey2> almost [09:15] <dmharvey2> a few files replaced too [09:15] <dmharvey2> and some lines inserted into a file somewhere [09:15] <mabshoff> okay. [09:15] <dmharvey2> and then the makefile mess [09:16] <dmharvey2> which someone like you can help me with :-) [09:16] <mabshoff> But no need to touch the autohell? [09:16] <dmharvey2> autohell is necessary unfortunately [09:16] <mabshoff> well, I have done stuff like that before. [09:16] <mabshoff> eek, I the the gmp autohell is worst than most [09:16] <mabshoff> I was attempting to use yasm for gmp assembly files instead of gcc-as [09:17] <mabshoff> Most of the assembly files crashed yasm, [09:17] <mabshoff> until I found out that most asm files in the gmp tree are written in m4! [09:17] <dmharvey2> there's some documentation to help us [09:17] <mabshoff> Good. [09:17] <dmharvey2> in the 4.2.2 tarball, in doc/configuration [09:18] <dmharvey2> grep for "Adding an mpn file" [09:18] <mabshoff> I think it wil be a while before 5.0 arrives, so using the new stuff and getting it some testing is a good idea. [09:18] <dmharvey2> and then later on there's a section called "The configure system" [09:18] <dmharvey2> which might mean somethingt o you [09:18] <dmharvey2> (yes, 5.0 will be a while I think.) [09:19] <dmharvey2> if we get the gcd code successfully into SAGE, I'm going to contact the author and let them know [09:19] <mabshoff> The adding an mpn file is pretty harmless, [09:19] <mabshoff> at least compared to some of the "real" macros they use. [09:20] <mabshoff> We should acutally keep a set of patches in the spkg, so that updating against a "vanilla" gmp is easy. [09:20] <mabshoff> And document it properly, I have no idea how the current gmp spkg looks like, [09:20] <dmharvey2> yes, good ide [09:20] <dmharvey2> idea [09:20] <mabshoff> but some of the other leave a lot to be desired. [09:20] <dmharvey2> my first mission is just to get GMP building with the new code, separately from SAGE [09:21] <dmharvey2> and demonstrate that it works and is fast [09:21] <mabshoff> Sure, give me a minute, I will read up on what is new. [09:21] <dmharvey2> does that sound reasonable? [09:21] <mabshoff> Sure [09:21] <mabshoff> I need to run out to get some groceris in the next hour or so, but that takes about 20 minutes. [09:21] <mabshoff> Overall I am ready to work the next 16 or so hours ; [09:21] <mabshoff> . [09:22] <sage> mabshoff -- the current gmp spkg has /src a 100% vanilla gmp. [09:22] <mabshoff> Great, so Martin's patch is applied conditonally= [09:22] <mabshoff> ? [09:22] <sage> i just bought groceries... [09:22] <mabshoff> That makes things much easier. [09:22] <sage> yes. [09:23] <mabshoff> pheeww. [09:23] <sage> It is total hell if you pre-apply anything to the gmp package... as [09:23] <dmharvey2> ummm.... so I'm thinking, should we separate the task of "including gcd code" from "upgrading to gmp 4.2.2"? [09:23] <sage> I *discovered* when in San Diego last month! [09:23] <dmharvey2> like, let's not try to do them at the same time? Or should we just try both? [09:23] <sage> dmharvey2 -- definitely, yes. [09:23] <sage> separate! [09:24] <dmharvey2> ok, well then I propose we leave upgrading to gmp 4.2.2 for a separate day [09:24] <dmharvey2> mainly because that's going to require test building on lots of different systems [09:24] <dmharvey2> whereas the gcd stuff, if it works on one system, is likely to work everwhere [09:25] <mabshoff> Sure, the only real improvement of gmp 4.2.2 in my opinion is the gcc 4.3 fix. [09:25] <wstein> yes. [09:25] <mabshoff> And that won't be an issue for most people for at least 3 months. [09:25] <dmharvey2> okay, in that case, I will make patches against 4.2.1, and we'll ignore 4.2.2. for today [09:25] <mabshoff> Yep. 4.2.2. is already a ticket in regards to the gcc 4.3 issue. [09:25] --> burcin has joined this channel ([email protected]). [09:26] <mabshoff> It was just dumn luck that gcc 4.2.2 came out and my suggestion got merged, [09:26] <mabshoff> hey burcin [09:26] <burcin> hello [09:26] <mabshoff> How are things on your end? [09:27] <burcin> I'm preparing for a late night :) [09:27] <mabshoff> Jep, I got up about 2.5 hours ago. [09:27] <wstein> i slept about 4-5 hours.... [09:27] <wstein> because I was up very late release sage-2.8.3.6 [09:27] <mabshoff> And with the added help of caffeine & sugar I shall not rest for a while. [09:28] <wstein> which has all my last few days of number fields code. [09:28] <mabshoff> Oh, I missed that one. [09:28] <mabshoff> Time to upgrade. [09:28] <wstein> sage -upgrade [09:28] <burcin> yes.. I also got up an hour ago.. :) [09:28] <burcin> .6 was a surprise.. [09:28] <wstein> did you upgrade? [09:28] <mabshoff> I did some timing on testall on 2.8.3 vs. 2.8.3.3 vs. 2.8.3.5 and they were in the same range. [09:28] <burcin> I'd left the others building before I slept.. [09:28] <burcin> now I'm upgrading :) [09:28] <mabshoff> ;) [09:29] <mabshoff> Are you in the student housing units? [09:29] <burcin> yes.. you can probably tell by my ip.. raabheim [09:29] <mabshoff> They are pretty nice, I was there for CoCoA VII this summer. [09:30] <mabshoff> true about the IP [09:31] <burcin> I'm in the one in linz.. you must have stayed in hagenberg.. but the rooms are the same.. [09:31] <mabshoff> Okay, I see. [09:31] <mabshoff> Yeah, we were at "Bobo's castle" [09:31] <mabshoff> :) [09:31] <mabshoff> Or is it Bubu? [09:31] <burcin> I work in the attic of that castle :) [09:32] <burcin> he's bookie mountain.. [09:32] <mabshoff> it is quite a nice place to work, but I hope it won't get too hot in the summer. [09:32] <mabshoff> ok, haven't heard that one. [09:32] <mabshoff> I will spend a lot more time in Hagenberg starting next summer. [09:33] <burcin> the attic is the hottest place in the castle.. in summer and winter.. but it's also the quitest.. [09:33] <burcin> next summer? risc summer I suppose.. [09:34] <burcin> someone should make a presentation at issac this time.. [09:34] <burcin> I've already talked to the program chair :) he says ok :) [09:34] <mabshoff> Maybe that, but Algebraic Oil works with Risc. [09:34] <mabshoff> ISAAC is at Hagenberg next year? Nice. [09:34] <burcin> really? risc software? or the institute? [09:34] <mabshoff> Well, nothing is written in stone yet, [09:35] <burcin> hmm.. it's issac.. intl. symposium on symbolic and algebraic computation [09:35] <burcin> I think isaac is some applied maths thing.. [09:35] <mabshoff> Sorry, butterfingers. [09:35] <mabshoff> Yeah, if you do CAS you ought to go to ISSAC. [09:36] <mabshoff> 2 years ago it was in Genoa, this year was Montreal I believe. [09:36] <mabshoff> How is chair next year? [09:36] <burcin> it was in toronto at waterloo [09:36] <burcin> franz (winkler), my adviser [09:36] <mabshoff> Well, Canada. [09:36] <mabshoff> Oh good [09:37] <mabshoff> How far along are you with your PhD? [09:37] <burcin> I am starting.. I came to risc last year.. [09:37] <mabshoff> Okay, 2 or 3 years to go then? [09:37] <burcin> had to take courses.. thinking, speaking, writing... bruno's ideas [09:38] <mabshoff> :) [09:38] <mabshoff> I heard about that one. [09:38] <burcin> so any bugs I can look at? memory leaks maybe? [09:38] <mabshoff> There are 15 tickets open. [09:38] <mabshoff> for memleaks. [09:39] <mabshoff> They are all listed at http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/milestone/sage-2.8.4 [09:39] <burcin> I'm looking at that now.. [09:39] <mabshoff> ok [09:39] <mabshoff> Do you have valgrind installed? [09:39] <burcin> I suppose we should rank them by the size of the leak :) [09:40] <mabshoff> There is an experimental spkg, but I think wstein did't put it up yet. [09:40] <burcin> yes.. but I don't have python built without it's memory allocation.. [09:40] <mabshoff> Certainly, but the noise small ones are just as annoying. [09:40] <mabshoff> That doesn't matter too much for the leaks. [09:40] <mabshoff> You just get a bunch of noise at the start of the logfile you can just ignore. [09:41] <burcin> do you get these links when you run a something specific? [09:41] <mabshoff> #566 is something nice to do. [09:41] <mabshoff> Yep, ususally it says in the report which command I ran. [09:42] <mabshoff> I.e. for #559 and most of the others it is right on top. [09:43] <mabshoff> #519 is very similar to #566 [09:43] <mabshoff> You need to move some of the code and write a proper deallocation function, that is called from sage/all.py upon exit. [09:43] <burcin> deallocation function on exit? [09:44] <burcin> on exit from sage? [09:44] <mabshoff> Yep, look at sage/all.py and there at "sage.matrix.matrix_mod2_dense.free_m4ri()" [09:44] <mabshoff> But wstein should say a couple things on where to move things. [09:45] --> timothyclemans has joined this channel ([email protected]). [09:45] <mabshoff> I haven't had a proper look at sagelib, so I cannot give and recommendations. [09:45] <mabshoff> Hello timothy [09:45] <timothyclemans> hi [09:46] <mabshoff> The free_m4ri() routine just illustrated how to write the "dealloc on exit"-routines for the gmp_rand state that we would otherwise leak. [09:46] <timothyclemans> is it ok to add bugs to sage-2.9 milestone? [09:46] <mabshoff> And for #566 you need to call a bunch of mpz_clear() and so on. [09:46] <mabshoff> Sure, what do you have in mind? [09:47] <timothyclemans> http://www.sagemath.org:9002/sage_trac/ticket/228 [09:47] <mabshoff> #519 and #566 should have most of that info in the comments, but feel free to ask wstein about the technical stuff. [09:48] <burcin> ok, thanks.. [09:48] <mabshoff> re #228: if boothby ask him to do it today :) [09:48] <burcin> I still don't get why just importing a module would leak memory... [09:48] <burcin> I'll look at the code a bit now [09:48] <mabshoff> We had some offline discussion and the problem is reference counting in sys/module [09:48] <mabshoff> At least that is what be believe. [09:49] <mabshoff> it isn't very pressing to solve because we do not leak any memory and the amount is constant (assuming constant number of modules) [09:49] <mabshoff> But solving that issue is more a longer term design issue for Cython. [09:50] <mabshoff> To really figure that out I probabyl need to read python sources for a couple weeks. [09:51] <dmharvey2> #424: I've made a patch which I think puts the right code in the right places. Next for the "autohell" stuff. [09:51] <dmharvey2> actually I'm going to get some lunch now [09:52] <mabshoff> Good, I will go grocery shopping, back in about 20. [09:52] --> syazdani has joined this channel ([email protected]). [09:52] <mabshoff> Then we can look at autohell in gmp ;) [09:52] *** mabshoff is now known as mabshoff|away. [09:54] <syazdani> Hello all. [09:55] <malb> hi [09:55] <wstein> hi syazdani [09:55] <wstein> we'll "start" in 5 minutes officially. [09:55] <syazdani> cool [09:56] <syazdani> that should give me enough time to catch up on my emails [09:56] --> robertwb has joined this channel ([email protected]). [09:57] <mhansen> Hello [09:57] <mhansen> Are we going to be using 2.8.3.6? [09:58] <malb> yes [09:58] <wstein> yes. [10:00] <wstein> hey, it's 10. [10:00] <wstein> I declare Bug Squash Day 2 officially started. [10:00] <wstein> Let's see if SAGE is ready for prime time or not. [10:00] <wstein> Could everybody maybe just mention where they are physically right now? [10:00] <wstein> I'm in Seattle. [10:00] <robertwb> Seattle [10:01] <wstein> (2 feet from me.) [10:01] <syazdani> Hamilton [10:01] <burcin> linz, austria [10:01] <-- dmharvey2 has left this server. [10:03] <wstein> make sure to do a "sage -upgrade" if you havne't already. [10:03] <burcin> even from .6? [10:03] <wstein> no sage-2.8.3.6 is the latest. [10:03] <burcin> yes.. it just told me now :) [10:04] <wstein> And if you'rein a hurry, doing hg_sage.pull() form sage 2.8.3.5 is fine. [10:04] <malb> London [10:04] <mhansen> Madison, WI [10:05] <wstein> Our ultimate goal is to close every genuine bug attached to sage-2.8.4 and 2.9 in trac. [10:05] --> dmharvey2 has joined this channel ([email protected]). [10:05] <wstein> Of course, working on other things is fine.... [10:05] <dmharvey> boston, USA [10:06] --> boothby has joined this channel ([email protected]). [10:06] <timothyclemans> so is there a way to share vmware files over network? [10:06] <malb> FTP? [10:07] <boothby> web 2.0! gmail! [10:07] <malb> where does sage -valgrind write the logfile? [10:07] <wstein> david joyner emailed me that he has posted fixes for trac #568, #569 #570. Does anybody want to verify that these work. [10:07] <wstein> Be nice. You maybe mean NFS. This is off topic for sage-devel though. [10:08] <timothyclemans> i know but i don't have working linux so i'm stuck with vmware for development [10:08] <wstein> I'm looking at #568 [10:09] <malb> I am looking at #558 [10:09] <wstein> By the way, if you weren't here last time, basically scan the list of open bugs listed at trac for sage-2.8.4 or sage-2.9. [10:09] <wstein> When you're working on one note that in irc. [10:09] <mabshoff|away> Well, I am back for a second: I am in Dortmund/Germany. [10:09] <boothby> I'm working on #503 [10:09] <wstein> When you refer to one in chat prefix the message with tthe trac number, e.g., [10:09] <wstein> #568: this is nuts. [10:10] <wstein> Since lots of different bugs will get discussed at the same time. [10:10] <wstein> Also, if you want to help somebody say -- [10:10] <wstein> #568 -- that looks interesting, I'm looking at it too. [10:10] <burcin> I'm trying #563.. [10:10] <wstein> #503 - is the "0^0" issue. comments welcome. [10:11] <mabshoff|away> Is anybody doing the official logging? [10:11] <mabshoff|away> Who wants to keep track of the bugs fixed? Or are we just using trac to sort that out after? [10:11] <wstein> I think keeping trac would be very good. [10:11] <wstein> Though trac does do it. [10:11] <wstein> Hmmm. [10:12] <wstein> mabshoff -- you're still marked as "away" [10:12] <mabshoff|away> I think mostly to aassign proper credit. [10:12] <wstein> I can log. [10:12] <wstein> yep. [10:12] <mabshoff|away> I know, just got out the shower, going shopping now. [10:12] <mabshoff|away> And on the internet I could be mabshoff's cat, just incredibly lucky that it can spell and type ;) [10:14] <malb> mabshoff where does sage-valgrind but its logfile? [10:14] <-- dmharvey2 has left this server. [10:16] <wstein> also, I will update the official sage repo as things are closed, so people can do hg_sage.pull() to get the fixes. [10:17] <wstein> #568 -- closed; thanks to David Joyner. [10:17] <burcin> malb: local/bin/sage.$PID [10:17] <malb> ah, thanks [10:18] <wstein> that's a dumb plce, no? [10:18] <wstein> maybe it should be in the current directory? [10:18] <malb> yes, or SAGE_ROOT [10:18] <wstein> make moving that a trac enhancement. [10:18] <malb> maybe one doesn't have write access there, so cwd would be good [10:18] <wstein> yep! [10:18] <wstein> I'm working on #569 now. [10:21] <burcin> SAGE_ROOT is better I think.. [10:21] <burcin> who's opening the ticket? [10:21] <malb> can we assume that we have write access there? [10:21] <malb> think about a system-wide SAGE install [10:21] <burcin> hmm.. good point.. no [10:21] <burcin> ok, so cwd? [10:22] <malb> sounds good to me, or .sage/<something> [10:22] <wstein> I've mad #599 the valgrind log file issue. [10:22] <burcin> as soon as we agree on the place.. I can implement it.. [10:23] <wstein> #569 -- closed (David Joyner had fixed it and his patch looks good). [10:23] <malb> I vote for $HOME/.sage/sage-memcheck.PID [10:24] <wstein> #599: +1 [10:24] <burcin> ok.. $HOME/.sage/sage-memcheck.$PID it is then [10:25] <malb> mabshoff might have strong feelings about it [10:25] <wstein> #594 -- I'm working on incorporating and testing this patch "Teach the MAGMA interface how to handle GF(q) conversions" [10:25] <malb> cool [10:26] <-- craigcitro has left this server. [10:26] --> pdehaye has joined this channel ([email protected]). [10:26] <wstein> hi pdehaye -- welcome to bug squash day 2. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:41] <sage> I don't remember, to be honest. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:19:53] <sage> You could remove setting it and do a complete build of SAGE and see if it works. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:03] <mabshoff> I could :) [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:30] <mabshoff> Problem might be that "LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.3.rc3/local/lib/:" has the trailing ":" [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:20:39] <sage> ah. you could change that too [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:06] <mabshoff> If LD_WHATEVER is empty skip the $LD_WHATEVER on export : [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:21:08] <mabshoff> . [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:13] <mabshoff> Removing the trailing ":" makes configure work. [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:22:42] <mabshoff> May be a bug in the configure macro, [Sun Sep 2 2007] [11:23:01] <mabshoff> because "empty string" after the separator ":" is not equal to "." [10:30] --> You have joined the channel #sage-devel ([email protected]). [10:31] *** Channel modes: secret, no messages from outside [10:31] *** This channel was created on 08/17/2007 01:03:33 PM. [10:31] <malb> I see [10:31] <dmharvey> back [10:31] <sage-log> sage-log == "William's home desktop" [10:33] <burcin> #599: it's a very simple change in local/bin/sage-valgrind [10:33] <burcin> #599: one can do it by hand, but there is a patch in trac too [10:33] <wstein> good. [10:34] <burcin> is there a way of making the sage shell not print out the output, without using assignments? [10:35] <wstein> no [10:35] <wstein> ; [10:36] <wstein> put a semicolon at the end of the line? [10:37] *** syazdani is now known as syazdani|away. [10:37] <-- pdehaye has left this server. [10:39] <wstein> #599 -- why is it "sage-memcheck" instead of "sage-valgrind"? [10:40] <wstein> #599 -- also, why remove the pid from the filename? [10:40] <burcin> valgrind puts the pid itself.. [10:40] <wstein> oh, good. [10:40] <malb> there are several valgrind tools [10:40] <malb> we are using memcheck right now [10:40] <sage-log> ok, that's clear. [10:40] <malb> but there is also massif and cachegrind and so on [10:41] <malb> so its good to allow different names for different valgrind tools [10:41] <mabshoff|away> hi [10:41] *** mabshoff|away is now known as mabshoff. [10:41] <mabshoff> I have patches for the proper place of logfiles, [10:41] <mabshoff> and massif + cachegrind [10:41] <mabshoff> support. [10:41] <dmharvey> hi mabshoff, do you want to work on gcd now? [10:42] <mabshoff> Give me about half am hour for valgrind patches. [10:42] <dmharvey> ok [10:42] <mabshoff> And I have two Solaris build issues I would like to get merged ASAP. [10:42] <mabshoff> 1 is in scons: prefer g++ over SunPro for compiler, [10:42] <mabshoff> the other two are build fixes in sage_lib for Solarisl [10:42] <mabshoff> . [10:43] <mabshoff> For valgrind: -valgrind becomes an alias for -memcheck [10:43] <mabshoff> I also add -massif and -cachegrind. [10:43] <mabshoff> For now they use the "default" flags I use, but we could add env variables to overwrite. [10:44] <mabshoff> That is not implemented yet. [10:44] <mabshoff> Should I send you the patch?? [10:44] <mabshoff> Or does anybody prefer something different? [10:45] <mabshoff> re pid & valgrind: That can be changed per default. [10:45] <malb> I am all for PID [10:46] <malb> maybe printing the PID at startup when run with valgrind would be nice [10:46] <mabshoff> Of which process? [10:46] <timothyclemans> i'm working on 549 [10:46] <mabshoff> The problem is that the output from 3.3.0svn no longer put the pid *inside* the logfile. [10:46] <mabshoff> But that let's you potentially diff output from different runs much better. [10:47] --> dmharvey2 has joined this channel ([email protected]). [10:47] <malb> process: SAGE the most interesting one [10:47] <wstein> #594 -- it's closed (and in) -- this is Malb's magma ideal patch. [10:47] <malb> cool [10:47] <wstein> malb -- i added a docstring to your magma.py ideal function. hg_sage.pull() and look to make sure it is ok. [10:47] <mabshoff> Is there an obvious non-racy way to getermine the SAGE pid? [10:48] <mabshoff> Also for the patch: Where is the official sage-script hg repo in the tarball? [10:48] <wstein> #549 -- I'm trying to replicate that too. [10:49] <timothyclemans> i see it [10:49] <timothyclemans> empty lines need <br /> [10:50] <timothyclemans> maybe do a loop and if i == '\n' add '<br />' ? [10:52] <malb> wstein, magma docstring looks good [10:53] <wstein> #549 -- no. [10:53] <wstein> since it's a pre environment. [10:54] <timothyclemans> in the html code i see the line spaces but they need to be <br /> [10:54] <wstein> #549 -- maybe the css is broken. [10:54] <timothyclemans> huh to do a line space don't you do <br /> [10:55] <wstein> In a pre that isn't needed. [10:55] <wstein> Try it by itself. [10:55] <timothyclemans> i am [10:56] <timothyclemans> i see [10:57] <wstein> #549 -- look at pre.shrunk in css.py. [10:58] <wstein> it has "display:inline" [10:58] <wstein> which evidently gets rid of blank spaces. [10:58] <wstein> If you comment it out, then the blank *lines* come back. [10:58] <wstein> Unfortunately there is way too much padding around the pre then. [10:58] <timothyclemans> also tidy says that you can't have span around pre [11:01] <mabshoff> malb, burcin: Suggestion now is: log to sage-memcheck.PID, sage-massif.PID, sage-cachegrind.PID in $SAGE_ROOT [11:01] <mabshoff> depending on the tool used. [11:01] <malb> no, not in $SAGE_ROOT we might not have write access there [11:01] <dmharvey2> #424: apart from the new files and lines of code, it looks like the following files *may* need to be modified: configure, configure.in, gmp-h.in, mpn/asm-defs.m4, mpn/Makefile.am, mpn/Makefile.in. I don't totally understand the relationship between these files, I know that automake or autoconf or something generates some of these files from others. But we don't want SAGE to depend on automake/autoconf etc, correct? So does that m [11:01] <mabshoff> true. [11:01] <mabshoff> $SAGE_RC? [11:02] <burcin> mabshoff: $HOME/.sage/ was suggested.. [11:02] <mabshoff> Okay, that works. [11:02] <mabshoff> but how about sage-$TOOL.$PID? [11:02] <wstein> #549 -- thanks timothy -- good point! [11:02] <burcin> mabshoff: yes.. I think that was the spirit of malb's sage-memcheck idea [11:03] <wstein> #549 -- your hint about span and pre was enough for tom to claim to know what to do. [11:03] <wstein> I'm going to stop working on #549 and let you and he work on it. [11:03] <mabshoff> Yep, will do. [11:03] <mabshoff> And I wil add the extra -massif & -cachegrind flags. [11:03] <mabshoff> -valgrind will stay an alias for memcheck [11:04] <mabshoff> Everybody happy that way? [11:04] <wstein> #424 -- SAGE can't depend on autoconf. [11:04] <burcin> mabshoff: yep, that great [11:04] <burcin> sorry.. can't type :) [11:04] <wstein> So whatever files you get when you do autoreconf --all you have to copy out to patches, then copy in during spkg-install. [11:04] <wstein> This is for #424 [11:05] <dmharvey> #424: I remember last time I tried using autoconf for this I had problems with a version mismatch [11:05] <dmharvey> #424: so maybe I'll try doing it manually [11:05] <wstein> #549 -- boothby has actually fixed this before and it got lost, evidently... [11:05] <wstein> dmharvey -- if possible you may want to work on sage.math for this, so others can look directly at what you're doing... [11:06] <dmharvey> wstein: okay, good idea, I'll move over there. Everything will be in /home/dmharvey/424/. (in a few minutes)
