TODO:

1. make sure dummy names are clear

Abstract

Here are some tentative workflow and naming conventions developed at Sage Days 54, together with some FAQs about using git.

Rationale

• Currently, the dev scripts are in a state of flux, and it's easy for a user to get their sage tree into a state where they are not working properly, or not working at all. They will eventually stabilize, and at that point they will be reliable in addition to being useful. Until then, it's important to know how to work with git directly.

• As noted by Linus on the meaning of "clean history", it's important to make a distinction between which parts of the development history are private to a single user, and which parts are considered public.

  • If a branch in the git tree is "private" to a single user, then they are free to experiment, merge many unrelated changes together, rebase things around, or simply abandon code. The compromise is that other users should not use such a "private" branch as the basis for developing their own code. If another user does this anyway, then the onus is on them to fix whatever merging problems (or rejections from the release manager) happen down the line. Of course, one way to fix this is to simply communicate (say by email) with the "owner" of the branch and work out an agreement.

  • Conversely, if a branch in the git tree is considered "public", then other people are justified in using it as the basis for developing their own code (provided that they accept the dependency this creates). At this point, the "public" branch should only ever be modified in a fast-forward way. Note that this still allows "undoing changes" in a way that preserves the public history, for example by using git revert.

  • If a user has a local branch on their own machine, of course that is "private".

  • Even though branches on Trac are world-visible, it would be useful to be able to use Trac as a repository for "private" sage branches. It seems that the natural place for this would be the "user" set of branches (which are named like u/[username]/[whatever], e.g., u/mguaypaq/farahat-higman).

  • Once a branch is listed on a Trac ticket, it should definitely be considered "public".

  • It's ok for the "branch" field on a Trac ticket to change once or twice, but any workflow that requires changing this field very frequently is probably doing something wrong. The "branch" field should say what the "official" version of the work on the ticket is, and the easiest way to let people work on this is to have it be in the "public" set of branches (which are named like public/[whatever], e.g., public/ticket/10305-farahat-higman or public/combinat/15361-branching-rules).

First-time setup

Talk about a sample ~/.gitconfig. Talk about a sample $SAGE_ROOT/.git/config.

git remote set-url origin [email protected]:sage.git

Basic git commands

Latest version of Sage itself

Getting the latest version of Sage

$ git checkout master
$ git pull --ff-only

Latest status of everything on trac

Getting the latest information about all the branches published on trac

$ git remote update origin

Pushing and pulling branches to and from trac

If you have a local branch on your personal computer that you would like to push to trac, there are three options:

$ git push --set-upstream origin <mybranch>:u/<mytracname>/<mybranch>
$ git push --set-upstream origin <mybranch>:public/combinat/<mybranch>
$ git push --set-upstream origin <mybranch>:public/ticket/<ticketnumber>-<mybranch>

You would use the first one for code you personally work on. The second option is for collaborative code with other combinat people. If you already have a ticket number, use

$ git push --set-upstream origin <mybranch>:public/combinat/<ticketnumber>-<mybranch>

The third option is for tickets unrelated to combinat.

The first time you pull a branch from trac onto your local computer:

$ git remote update origin
$ git checkout -b 10305-partition origin/public/ticket/10305-partition

After the initial pull or push, this is the workflow to push your local changes to trac:

$ git checkout <mybranch>
$ git pull --ff-only
$ git push

The option --ff-only for the pull command makes sure that if there are big merge conflicts with the new changes on trac, you can handle them manually without messing up your entire branch and your local changes. If there are big changes, you can use these commands:

$ git checkout <mybranch>
$ git pull --ff-only
*git complains*
$ git fetch
$ git merge FETCH_HEAD
...
*resolve any merge conflicts*
*or give up and say: "git merge --abort"*
...
$ git status
...
*some output???*
...
$ git commit -a -m '<some message>'
$ git push

Deleting branches

If you want to delete a local branch:

$ git checkout <somethingelse>
$ git branch -d <mybranch>

This might complain if you are trying to delete a branch that has not been merged yet. If nonetheless you would like to delete it, try a hard delete:

$ git branch -D <mybranch>

Even in a hard delete this can be undone in the next 30 days (before the commits get garbage collected).

To delete a remote branch:

$ git push origin :u/aschilling/<something>

The syntax here may look confusing, so here is a little explanation: it is actually a special case of the syntax

$ git push origin <localbranch>:<remotebranch>

which updates <remotebranch> on the remote server to be the same as <localbranch>. To delete a branch, we make <remotebranch> be completely blank.

Resetting unwanted changes

If you accidentally edited master and want to undo your change

$ git branch -m master <mybranch>
$ git branch master origin/master

If you do not care about the changes you can do a hard reset

$ git reset --hard origin/master

Branch naming conventions

Local machine

On your local machine you can call your branches however you like. However, it might be useful to use the same names that you use on trac.

<mystuff>

Trac with single author

If you are working on a branch yourself, then it is best to put your patches on trac in your personal space

u/<myname>/<mystuff>

Trac with collaboration

If you collaborate on a branch with others or have already a ticket number, then please put your branch on the public space and mark it as combinat

public/combinat/<mystuff>

Naming and searching

The branch name should be descriptive. If you have a ticket number (say 10305) that should be the first part of the name. The rest should describe what is in the branch, so people can easily search it

public/combinat/10305-partition-tableaux

Consistently using these naming conventions among all (sage-combinat) developers will make it easier to search for stuff. For example, trying to find all branches related to combinatorics can be found as follows

$ git ls-remote origin '*combinat*'
5feebdbfa73f64dafe28a5e4fe0144ab36083ab0        refs/heads/public/combinat/15361-branching-rules
7f974aeb3446206c029ac047c31938d55d86e651        refs/heads/u/aschilling/combinat/kschur

If you want to see what a specific author did on trac within the last day, you do

$ git remote update origin
$ git log --all --author="Bump" --since=1.day
commit 5feebdbfa73f64dafe28a5e4fe0144ab36083ab0
Author: Daniel Bump <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Nov 6 09:51:08 2013 -0800

    get_branching_rule for F4=>B3 and G2=>A1 should return vectors of the correct length

Checking how the ticket branches of author mguaypaq differ from main sage (or origin/master) try

$ git log --remotes='origin/u/mguaypaq/ticket/*' ^origin/master --oneline
1c7458a #15300: Implement Weyl and Clifford algebras.
fb33147 Merge branch 'master' into ticket/10305
405178b Remove extra chunk from farahat_higman.py and fix related formatting issues.
25ff1fd Split off SymmetricGroupAlgebraCenter to its own file.
9b72574 Add rings for the center of the symmetric group algebras.

Example workflow

Moving a ticket from patches to git

Moving a patch from the combinat queue to git

All patches in the queue will soon be merged from the sage-combinat queue to git branches on trac. Authors who want to do this themselves are encouraged to do so. The script will by default put the branches to public/combinat/branchname and might loose author information if the patch does not have the appropriate meta information.

Here is a sample workflow on how to transform your patch to git:

Export hg patch

First make sure that your patch has the correct meta data by exporting it.

Create new local branch

Make a new branch on your local machine:

$ git checkout -b combinat/kschur master
$ git branch
* combinat/kschur
  master
  ticket/15300

Import patch from queue

Next import the patch from the queue

$ sage --dev import-patch --local-file </Applications/sage-5.13.beta2/devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches/kschur-as.patch>

Create branch on trac

Now we create a branch on trac

$ git push --set-upstream origin <combinat/kschur>:<u/aschilling/combinat/kschur>
Counting objects: 47, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done.
Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 1.27 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 7 (delta 6), reused 0 (delta 0)
To [email protected]:sage.git
 * [new branch]      combinat/kschur -> u/aschilling/combinat/kschur
Branch combinat/kschur set up to track remote branch u/aschilling/combinat/kschur from origin.

Mark patch in series file

Mark the patch in the sage-combinat series file as moved to git by changing

kschur-as.patch

to

kschur-as.patch # git:u/aschilling/combinat/kschur

References

• Linus on the meaning of "clean history"

• The new sage developer guide