Differences between revisions 11 and 13 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 11 as of 2009-06-05 01:48:24
Size: 3936
Editor: WilliamHart
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2009-06-05 01:57:36
Size: 3932
Editor: WilliamHart
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 34: Line 34:
* Computing factorials (Magma takes 50% longer). * Computing factorials (Sage is more than twice the speed).
Line 36: Line 36:
[[email protected]]$ ~/eno/build/sage-3.4.alpha0/sage [[email protected] sage-4.0.1.rc1]$ ./sage
Line 38: Line 38:
| Sage Version 3.4.alpha0, Release Date: 2009-02-24 | | Sage Version 4.0.1.rc1, Release Date: 2009-06-04  |
Line 42: Line 42:
((2, 15, 5), 'V2.15-5') ((2, 15, 8), 'V2.15-8')
Line 44: Line 44:
CPU times: user 0.94 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 0.96 s
Wall time: 0.98 s
CPU times: user 0.57 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.58 s
Wall time: 0.59 s
Line 47: Line 47:
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 0.02 s
Wall time: 2.95 s
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
Wall time: 1.45 s
Line 52: Line 52:
Wall time: 27.88 s
'Time: 27.340'
Wall time: 27.33 s
'Time: 27.300'
Line 55: Line 55:
CPU times: user 18.60 s, sys: 0.17 s, total: 18.76 s
Wall time: 19.11 s
sage: 27.34/18.76
1.45735607675906
CPU times: user 11.50 s, sys: 0.25 s, total: 11.75 s
Wall time: 11.75 s
sage: 27.30/11.75
2.32340425531915
Line 65: Line 65:
| Sage Version 4.0.alpha0, Release Date: 2009-05-15 | | Sage Version 4.0.1.rc1, Release Date: 2009-06-04 |
Line 70: Line 70:
CPU times: user 1.23 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 1.23 s
Wall time: 1.25 s
9998
CPU times: user 1.20 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 1.20 s
Wall time: 1.20 s
9999
Line 76: Line 75:
CPU times: user 9.65 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 9.67 s
Wall time: 9.85 s
CPU times: user 9.34 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 9.36 s
Wall time: 9.36 s
Line 81: Line 80:
CPU times: user 7.26 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 7.27 s
Wall time: 7.40 s
CPU times: user 6.79 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 6.80 s
Wall time: 6.80 s
Line 86: Line 84:
CPU times: user 34.60 s, sys: 0.05 s, total: 34.65 s
Wall time: 35.21 s
CPU times: user 31.57 s, sys: 0.05 s, total: 31.62 s
Wall time: 31.63 s
Line 90: Line 88:
CPU times: user 28.35 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 28.39 s
Wall time: 28.86 s
CPU times: user 27.10 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 27.14 s
Wall time: 27.15 s

List of Computations where Sage is Noticeably Faster than Magma....

Machines used

eno: (a binary of Sage 4.0.1-rc1 is available at /home/wbhart/sage-4.0.1.rc1/sage on eno) (a script to stop background processes for benchmarking purposes is available at /home/wbhart/script - but please stop it when done)

4-core: model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU    Q6600  @ 2.40GHz

Benchmarks

* Large degree polynomial multiplication modulo n (sage is three times as fast):

[[email protected] sage-4.0.1.rc1]$ ./sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 4.0.1.rc1, Release Date: 2009-06-04                   |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage: magma.version()
((2, 15, 8), 'V2.15-8')
sage: R.<t> = Zmod(next_prime(8000^3))[]
sage: ff = R.random_element(degree=3200)
sage: time v = [ff*ff for i in [1..100]]
CPU times: user 0.18 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.18 s
Wall time: 0.18 s
sage: S = magma(R)
sage: f = magma('%s![Random(0,10000000) : i in [1..3200]]'%S.name())
sage: magma.eval('time z:=[%s*%s : i in [1..100]]'%(f.name(), f.name()))
'Time: 0.540'

* Computing factorials (Sage is more than twice the speed).

[[email protected] sage-4.0.1.rc1]$ ./sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 4.0.1.rc1, Release Date: 2009-06-04                   |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage: magma.version()
((2, 15, 8), 'V2.15-8')
sage: time n = factorial(10^6)
CPU times: user 0.57 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.58 s
Wall time: 0.59 s
sage: time magma.eval('time n := Factorial(10^6);')
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
Wall time: 1.45 s
'Time: 1.440'
sage: time magma.eval('time n := Factorial(10^7);')
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
Wall time: 27.33 s
'Time: 27.300'
sage: time n = factorial(10^7)
CPU times: user 11.50 s, sys: 0.25 s, total: 11.75 s
Wall time: 11.75 s
sage: 27.30/11.75
2.32340425531915

* Rank of random dense matrices over GF(2)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 4.0.1.rc1, Release Date: 2009-06-04                   |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(2),10^4,10^4)
sage: %time A.rank()
CPU times: user 1.20 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 1.20 s
Wall time: 1.20 s
9999
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(2),2*10^4,2*10^4)
sage: %time A.rank()
CPU times: user 9.34 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 9.36 s
Wall time: 9.36 s
19937
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(2),2*10^4,2*10^4)
sage: %time A.echelonize(algorithm='pluq')
CPU times: user 6.79 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 6.80 s
Wall time: 6.80 s
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(2),3.2*10^4,3.2*10^4)
sage: %time A.rank()
CPU times: user 31.57 s, sys: 0.05 s, total: 31.62 s
Wall time: 31.63 s
19937
sage: %time A.echelonize(algorithm='pluq')
CPU times: user 27.10 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 27.14 s
Wall time: 27.15 s

Magma V2.15-8     Sun May 17 2009 13:16:26 on eno      [Seed = 595144467]
Type ? for help.  Type <Ctrl>-D to quit.
> A:=RandomMatrix(GF(2),10^4,10^4);
> time Rank(A);
10000
Time: 2.790

> A:=RandomMatrix(GF(2),2*10^4,2*10^4);
> time Rank(A);
20000
Time: 19.500

> A:=RandomMatrix(GF(2),32*10^3,32*10^3);
> time Rank(A);
31999
Time: 63.480

....But Magma has the following features which Sage doesn't have (yet)

* fast and correct multivariate polynomial factorisation algorithm

* fast Gröbner basis computations mod p (p > 2, p prime) and QQ

* fast GCD of multivariate polynomials

sagebeatsmagma (last edited 2009-06-12 09:39:03 by was)