|
Size: 2466
Comment:
|
Size: 2461
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| * (positive review) [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1173|#1173]] implement numerical evaluation of erf at complex arguments | * (needs work) [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1173|#1173]] implement numerical evaluation of erf at complex arguments |
Bugs We're Working On (Status)
For Sage Days 35.5.
Bugs to work on and/or solve
(needs work) #9130 Access to beta function
(new) #11201 Point users of solve() to the to_poly_solve option
(needs work) #1173 implement numerical evaluation of erf at complex arguments
(needs work) #11143 Finish ticket defining symbolic functions for exponential integral special functions
(new) #12074 symbolic nth root function for plotting, etc.
(new) #12075 function notation for callable matrices
(new) #12094 update Maxima
(new) #12220 Updated CBC package
(new) #9248 Doc fix for factorial function (types of accepted input)
(new) #12286 Doc fix for factorial function (algorithm parameter)
Pages on Trac with lots more bugs of relevance
Not really a bug
#12060 Add formatting option to slider's displayed value
Bugs actually worked on and/or solved
(needs review) #10489 Slope fields and python lambdas: Rebasing outdated patch, needs review
(needs review) #10757 Laplacian matrix: Created patch fixing and documenting div-by-0 error
(needs review) #11462 @parallel documentation update: Created patch updating the documentation
(needs review) #11888 Sage is missing the lambert_w function conversion from Maxima
(needs review) #11513 Finish ticket adding _is_numerically_zero() to symbolic expressions