|
Size: 4196
Comment:
|
← Revision 69 as of 2015-09-10 13:19:27 ⇥
Size: 4138
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 29: | Line 29: |
| * The depreciation explication in Developer's guide is unclear : the use of * shouldn't be there, or made more precise. In general, the depreciation should be made more clear for when you move a file. http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_in_python.html#deprecation | * The deprecation explication in Developer's guide is unclear. Especially, the deprecation should be made more clear for when you move a file. http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_in_python.html#deprecation |
Sage Days 69: Women in Sage 6 (September 4-9, 2015)
Saturday (Sept 5)
- 9:00 a.m. getting started on trac
- 10:30 a.m. projects
- 5:00 p.m. status reports
Sunday (Sept 6)
- 9:00 a.m. review a patch example
- 10:00 a.m. project work
- 5:00 p.m. workshop dinner
Monday (Sept 7)
- 10:00 a.m. project work
- 5:00 p.m. status reports
Tuesday (Sept 8)
- 10:00 a.m. project work
- 5:00 p.m. status reports
Wednesday (Sept 9)
- 10:00 a.m. departure
Projects:
- Writing/fixing documentation: fixing typos
- git command should be git -command
git trac review : In http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/git_trac.html#reviewing , "git trac review 12345 downloads the branch from the ticket and shows you what is being added" is not exactly what it does.
The deprecation explication in Developer's guide is unclear. Especially, the deprecation should be made more clear for when you move a file. http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_in_python.html#deprecation
The way to install Sage for developers is wrong : "You can use your local installation of Sage, or (to start without Sage) download it from github which is a public read-only mirror (=faster) of our internal git repository". I think we had difficulties developing because we tried to use our local installation (with the tar file) instead of the git one. http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/walk_through.html#obtaining-the-sage-source-code
- Reviewing patches
- ABC project (Lily, Kristin, Aly, Jen, Jen)
- Modular forms project (Jackie, Aly, Lubjana)
- Combinatorics patches (Emily, Nadia, Stéphanie, Mélodie)
Finish fully packed loop class http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18003
Create a snake graph class (using part of the code written for on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16310)
Words : Lyndon and Christoffel words. See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19150, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19154, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19155, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19159 and more patches coming soon
Review patches : http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19008 (about graphs), http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19161 (about posets)
- Recurrences for hypergeometric sums - Sister Celine's algorithm code (Karen)
- Analytic rank for elliptic curve L-functions (Michelle)
- Reducing models of hyperelliptic curves (Lubjana)
- Newton's method bug (Amy)
- No more bug.
- Updating old Sage worksheets to public SMC worksheets (Amy)
- Discrete Gaussian sampler bug (Kristin, Amy)
- Sturm sequences/ Weil polynomials (Alina) - patch in FLINT
- Power sums of roots of polynomials (Alina) - implement it in Sage (goal: beat pari)
Participant Tickets
Easy Trac Tickets
- To Review
- Updates in Documentation
Things that people at SD69 have a personal interest in seeing work
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8559 (Amy - might be easy)
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14756 (Lubjana)
Organizers: Jennifer Balakrishnan, Alyson Deines
Participants:
- Jen Berg
- Lubjana Beshaj
- Alina Bucur
- Amy Feaver
- Emily Gunawan
- Lily Khadjavi
- Karen Kohl
- Michelle Kovesi
- Kristin Lauter
- Nadia Lafrenière
- Jackie Lang
- Mélodie Lapointe
- Stéphanie Schanck